Saving AIDS Support Grant

posted: 26/05/2010

Before the election, the end of ring-fenced AIDS Support Grant for local councils was announced. The new coalition government has now said it will phase out all types of ring-fenced grants for councils.
 

National AIDS Trust has now written to Paul Burstow (Lib Dem, Sutton & Cheam in Surrey), the new Minister for State for Social Care Services, setting out the need to continue to ring-fence AIDS Support Grant after 2011.

It has also written to Anne Milton, the new Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Public Health.

The new Government has emphasised the importance of public health interventions, and NAT stress the potential public health implications of removing of the ring-fence. Because of this, and given the recent commitment to phase out ring-fenced grants for local authorities, NAT also suggests that the Grant could be paid to PCTs instead, rather than local authorities.
 

Add Your Voice

Organisations and individuals may wish to write to Paul Burstow, or their local MP, to emphasise the vital role of the ring-fenced ASG. NAT’s letter to the minister can be used by people and organisations to make the point that the ring-fence is still needed.
 

Any letters to the minister should reflect the local situation. You might emphasise these points:

• The important role ASG funding currently plays in funding local services
• The impact the loss of the ring fence would have on funding for HIV orgnaisations (it is far less likely that local authorities will continue to fund services without the ring fence - what would happen to people if support is no longer available?)
• Some case studies showing the difference the Grant makes to the lives of individuals and families in your area

NAT 2009 report on The AIDS Support Grant – Making a Difference?

 
Latest Department of Health details on ASG allocations for each council in England and how it should be spent  
 

NW England
AIDS Support Grant 2009-2010 and total HIV population by social services district
download our handy guide for NW England here

The AIDS Support Grant allocations for the current year, April 2010 – March 2011, have not been published – it should be listed as a circular here

Here is gathered information from Freedom of Information requests on AIDS Support Grant in different parts of England 

text of NAT letter to Minister
image

HIV Stigma and Harassment Action

posted: 24/03/2010

Ending HIV stigma and harassment has edged a little closer. An official inquiry is about to begin into progress by public authorities on eliminating disability harassment – and this includes HIV stigma. The Inquiry is called because of recent cases of severe disability harassment neglected by public authorities. Councils and the NHS, among other public bodies, are simply not doing what the law tells them to - eliminate disability harassment.

Last week George House Trust met with the Equalities and Human Rights Commission in Manchester at a consultation into exactly what the disability harassment inquiry should look into.
 

• We made it plain that the official Inquiry must include HIV and not just people with learning difficulties or mental health problems.
• We said that people with invisible but highly stigmatised conditions like HIV face considerable disability harassment and stigma, and many barriers to complaining.
• We said that public bodies, with rare exceptions, ignore their duty to eliminate HIV disability harassment and stigma.

Over the next year the Equality and Human Rights Commission will investigate and we have offered to help gather HIV evidence. We are working with NAT to make this a nationwide effort.
 

What will happen?
The Commission has considerable powers to force public bodies to act if they are not doing their job. We have a right to expect things to improve and the least we expect is public campaigns to make HIV stigma and harassment socially unacceptable everywhere, a bit like the Kick Racism out of Football campaign.
 

The powers the EHRC has to force public bodies to eliminate HIV stigma and harassment means HIV stigma and harassment could really start to fade away. We think the Commission should start using its powers - this is one of the best hopes we have for ending HIV stigma and harassment.
 

We’ll keep you updated on the Inquiry and how you can give evidence confidentially.
Disability Harassment Inquiry
 

Training for Councils - No Recourse to Public Funds

posted: 21/12/2009

A full day's training for councils on their legal duties to support people and families with ‘no recourse to public funds’ (NRPF) is provided by the NRPF Network along with London’s Islington Council. A significant number of migrants with HIV in NW England are subject to the No Recourse to Public Funds rules. Some NW England councils apply the rules very harshly or refuse to even accept they have any legal duty to assess people or help. Other councils do their duty well.

The training

• focuses on good practice in assessing and supporting people with NRPF
• provides an overview of relevant legislation and case-law and
• invites participants to explore other factors to be considered where immigration status impacts on entitlements to services in the UK.

Since April 2009, there have been 17 of these sessions for councils and voluntary sector organisations across the UK and the feedback is very positive.

The full details of the training days are on the NRPF microsite and any requests or enquiries can be made by email

In NW England councils vary widely in how well they perform meet their legal duties towards people with HIV under these rules.